Safety

Documents

Order by : Name | Date | Hits | [ Descendent ]
  • The Safety of 1-DIN Aftermarket Devices- Problems, Solutions and Perspectives

    1-DIN aftermarket equipment for in-vehicle use has special challenges from the human machine interface (HMI) perspective. Development and sales of these systems is usually driven by cost. The face plate is limited in space. Displays are limited in size. The user group is very inhomogeneous. Competition between producers is hard, at stores aftermarket devices are presented parallel, so users choice will be influenced by the price and “at first sight”- attractivity. After all, the HMI design has to match safety criteria. The use of the systems on the road should be non-distractive, safe, fast, and easy. On the other side, additional functions beside traditional audio subsystems, like telephone, WAP applications, or navigation become more and more part of 1-DIN aftermarket devices. Latest systems are scalable, meaning, the user may add subsystems, following his own needs. In a study with 35 subjects, representing traditional user groups in age and gender, different versions of faceplates were rated. Results show smaller differences in human factors oriented items (readability, color coding, display size) but clear differences on the emotional side (“I like it”, “I would love to own it”, …). An expert-analysis of existing systems lead to the following suggestions: reduction of number of buttons, upsizing the display, allowing direct access to main functions, creating a flat menu tree, or using status information to keep the user up with information on were certain functions are etc. The graphic design of the system should meet the taste and the expectations of the targeted users. On basis of the study and the analysis solutions were developed.

    Harman/Becker Automotive Systems GmbH, Filderstadt

    Presented at the ITS America Annual Conference and Exposition, April 26 - 28, 2004 San Antonio, Texas

  • Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for Improved Mobility and Safety

    Conventional Cruise Control (CCC) systems are present on most production vehicles today that simply hold a vehicle at a preset speed. This relieves the driver of this task, making the overall driving task easier, more enjoyable and less fatiguing. However, CCC systems are only useful for holding steady speeds and when the appropriate vehicle speed is not influenced by the actions of other vehicles. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) normally acts like a CCC, but has sensors that detect the range and relative speed of a vehicle ahead, matching speed with that vehiclewhen necessary.  Generally the places where CCC and ACC do not work are the most challenging and dangerous driving situations where drivers have several tasks to manage at the same time. This is both unpleasant for the driver and dangerous. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) systems address this limitation by using vehicle computers and digital vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication to hold a vehicle speed determined through a cooperative process between a vehicle and its neighbors.  
    Experimental CACC systems have been simulated and implemented for automated highways for the support of platoons. This report discusses a CACC implemented as an emulator and installed as a user defined driver model in the traffic micro-simulation code VISSIM. The CACC emulator is designed to take over vehicle speed control when the vehicle enters a critical zone, which in this case is either a weave or a merge zone. VISSIM simulates a roadway with traffic and measures mobility and traffic density through the critical zone. Mobility of vehicles under  control of the CACC emulator is compared with the mobility of vehicles under the control of VISSIM's driver model to demonstrate the effect of the CACC emulator on mobility. VISSIM is also used to record headway time through the critical zone as a measure of safety and following stability.

    Ford Motor Company

    Presented at the ITS America Annual Conference and Exposition, April 26 - 28, 2004 San Antonio, Texas

  • Emergency Management Agencies and Transportation Management Centers Integration

    Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Transportation Management Centers (TMC)
    provide a lucrative partner for regional and statewide Emergency Management Agencies
    (EMA). Even before the heightened interest in domestic security issues, EMAs have been
    approaching TMC’s in hopes of leveraging their access to surveillance and other key
    transportation service providers for “eyes-on-the-road” information without having to travel
    out of the emergency management center and in to harms way.  

    This paper documents two recent efforts in the US by local and regional EMAs in their
    efforts to coordinate with and collocate within TMCs.  The first case study is that of
    Columbus, Ohio where the county EMA desires to collocate with regional transportation
    resources, including transit, traffic signal, freeway and other safety operations.  And a
    second case study is that of Chicago, Illinois where the city’s Emergency Operations Center
    (EOC) plans is studying the feasibility of building a joint facility with the city’s TMC.
    There are positives, negatives and differing reasons for wanting to combine EMAs and
    TMCs. This paper explains the reasons for each approach, assesses some of the advantages
    of these partnerships for both parties, and delves in to some of the hurdles the partners are
    working to overcome in achieving their respective goals.

    Cambridge Systematics

    Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

    Presented at the ITS America Annual Conference and Exposition, April 26 - 28, 2004 San Antonio, Texas

  • Investigation of Driving Behavior Changes Associated With Manual and Voice-Activated Phone-Dialing

    This research effort examined the effects of three different types of cell-phone dialing on driving behavior: discrete 10-digit phone dialing using a hands-free, voice-activated system; continuous 10-digit phone dialing using a hands-free, voice-activated system; and manual 10-digit phone dialing using a cell-phone held in a cradle.  The driving behavior of the three dialing tasks was compared to normal driving.  Thirty-six participants, divided into two age groups (i.e., 18-34 years and 45-65 years, 18 participants per group), drove an instrumented vehicle on an interstate freeway and were allowed to perform tasks when they felt comfortable.  The dependent measurements that were analyzed included task completion time, average speed, percent of time out of the lane, and percent of glance time to several locations (e.g., forward roadway, mirrors).  
    The results of the driving performance did not result in any differences in terms of average speed and lane maintenance, although the optimal placement of the hand-held cell phone may have influenced this finding. The results of the glance analysis suggest that glance patterns during hands-free, voice-activated dialing and baseline driving are similar, while manual dialing of a cell-phone resulted in a significant decrease in both forward and peripheral glances, as well as
    glances toward the speedometer.

    OnStar Corporation

    Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

    Presented at the ITS America Annual Conference and Exposition, April 26 - 28, 2004 San Antonio, Texas

  • A 2D Collision Warning Framework based on a Monte Carlo Approach

    This paper describes a general method to generate warnings for the driver of a vehicle. The
    method takes into account the current measured state of the own vehicle and observed objects, the uncertainties of these measurements, models of driver, vehicle, and object behavior, and information about the environment, especially how it influences the driver and the observed object. This method is designed to work in two dimensions. It is being implemented into a side collision warning system for transit buses.

    Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University

    Presented at the ITS America Annual Conference and Exposition, April 26 - 28, 2004 San Antonio, Texas

    • «
    •  Start 
    •  Prev 
    •  1 
    •  2 
    •  3 
    •  4 
    •  5 
    •  6 
    •  7 
    •  8 
    •  9 
    •  10 
    •  Next 
    •  End 
    • »
    Page 1 of 65
    About Us | Membership | Advocacy | Councils | Forums | News | Calendar of Events
    © Intelligent Transportation Society of America
    1100 17th Street NW, Suite 1200  Washington, DC 20036
    1-800-374-8472 or 202-484-4847  Email: info@itsa.org